For the publisher: I am really happy that my children had the experience of living in a democracy. It seems that this is quickly becoming a relic of the past. (“Three Californians, GOP Cheney among Pelosi’s Choices for Investigating Panel Jan. 6,” July 1, and “Supreme Court limited Voting Rights Act in decision for Arizona Republicans,” July 1.
Today, July 4, we celebrate 245 years of the experience of the republic of the United States of government of the people, by the people and for the people. The current Republican Party has made those words empty with its refusal to negotiate to achieve legislation in the interest of the vast majority of the public, such as the creation of a commission to investigate the January 6 insurgency or to protect voting rights.
I cry for the nation I worshiped and fought for. I don’t completely blame former President Trump – he was a symptom of the fantasy that a strong man could solve all of our problems. I see very little hope for our future
Joni Mitchell put it right when she sang, “You don’t know what you have until he’s gone. “
Barbara H. Bergen, Los Angeles
For the publisher: I’m old enough to remember the Tories moaning and gritting their teeth about Earl Warren’s court, claiming he overstepped his bounds by legislating from the bench. But apparently, it’s okay for the current ultra-conservative Supreme Court to pretend it’s Congress.
Judges once again gutted the voting rights law, allowing Arizona to make it a felony for anyone to hand out mail-in ballots other than family members and postal workers.
Many tribesmen have no postal service and have to drive an hour or more to the nearest post office. Many of these same people have limited access to transportation, and the only convenient way for them to vote has been by relying on friends and neighbors to bring their ballots to the post office.
The Supreme Court has now enshrined systemic racism against Native Americans.
Scott McKenzie, La Cañada Flintridge
For the publisher: The Los Angeles Times front page for July 2 read: “Judges strike blow at voting rights law.” That says all about the newspaper’s leftist tendencies.
An article in the Wall Street Journal reporting the same Supreme Court decision was titled “Justices Respect Arizona Election Rules.” The difference is stubborn rhetoric over objective reporting.
The Times continues to post its leftist opinion on the front page. Unfortunately, the Times has forgotten the importance of objectivity so critical to good journalism.
John Gosch, Encino